Prompt: "基于 frontend-design 技能，为我设计并生成一个现代化的技术博客首页。要求如下：
杜耀豪分析，“我无法确定是不是钱的原因。不过有可能，因为那时候如果想被‘赎回’，释放的程序很模糊不清，官员或者狱警都需要行贿”。越共刚刚掌控的越南南部，“非常不稳定，每个人都在想接下来该怎么做才能生存下来、保护家人”。或许这种“牺牲一个，换另外两个”的抉择，是无数家庭在极端动荡中被迫面对的普遍现实。
。关于这个话题，搜狗输入法2026提供了深入分析
Log in with single-sign on (SSO) and have access to 24/7 Enterprise-level support.
Around this time, my coworkers were pushing GitHub Copilot within Visual Studio Code as a coding aid, particularly around then-new Claude Sonnet 4.5. For my data science work, Sonnet 4.5 in Copilot was not helpful and tended to create overly verbose Jupyter Notebooks so I was not impressed. However, in November, Google then released Nano Banana Pro which necessitated an immediate update to gemimg for compatibility with the model. After experimenting with Nano Banana Pro, I discovered that the model can create images with arbitrary grids (e.g. 2x2, 3x2) as an extremely practical workflow, so I quickly wrote a spec to implement support and also slice each subimage out of it to save individually. I knew this workflow is relatively simple-but-tedious to implement using Pillow shenanigans, so I felt safe enough to ask Copilot to Create a grid.py file that implements the Grid class as described in issue #15, and it did just that although with some errors in areas not mentioned in the spec (e.g. mixing row/column order) but they were easily fixed with more specific prompting. Even accounting for handling errors, that’s enough of a material productivity gain to be more optimistic of agent capabilities, but not nearly enough to become an AI hypester.
Many people reading this will call bullshit on the performance improvement metrics, and honestly, fair. I too thought the agents would stumble in hilarious ways trying, but they did not. To demonstrate that I am not bullshitting, I also decided to release a more simple Rust-with-Python-bindings project today: nndex, an in-memory vector “store” that is designed to retrieve the exact nearest neighbors as fast as possible (and has fast approximate NN too), and is now available open-sourced on GitHub. This leverages the dot product which is one of the simplest matrix ops and is therefore heavily optimized by existing libraries such as Python’s numpy…and yet after a few optimization passes, it tied numpy even though numpy leverages BLAS libraries for maximum mathematical performance. Naturally, I instructed Opus to also add support for BLAS with more optimization passes and it now is 1-5x numpy’s speed in the single-query case and much faster with batch prediction. 3 It’s so fast that even though I also added GPU support for testing, it’s mostly ineffective below 100k rows due to the GPU dispatch overhead being greater than the actual retrieval speed.